FRIENDS OF WENONAH


 

     Just some thoughts to think about....                    

                                               

 


The Republican Committee does not support the PATCO train coming through Wenonah in any capacity.
Although, as a Committee we do not support the train, despite our political affiliations--as homeowners in this great town, individually we do not support the train.
 
     There have been many documents sent and drafted to the press over the last few years. Some of the protests seem to have had the effect of significant design revisions, none of them improvements. In fact, to address the complaint that cross-country auto traffic will be totally disrupted every 8-9 minutes during peak traffic periods they now say they will lower the rails into a trench or elevate them. Either way it will destroy the essence of Victorian Wenonah.
 
      Can you imagine this division of the town? How will it affect our children and friends riding bikes and walking to friends homes? Also, both the train station and the new municipal building will more than likely have to be removed or severely compromised. What they are proposing is a terribly expensive and virtually useless attempt to correct the highway overcrowding that gets worse and will continue to do so with their plan. We have made suggestions as to how to improve the situation but those in power don't want to hear what has to be done. Senator Sweeney wants a massive construction project to benefit the building trades, construction unions that he is a major player in.
 
     We, here in Wenonah certainly must be concerned with the construction, the noise, the traffic, safety, the impact it will have on our very special homes and area businesses.
 
     Our website was only constructed to keep people informed as to what is going on around town. Sometimes it is something fun or some sort of public service and sometimes it is just information that the town needs to be aware of and each person can form their own opinions.
 
      Please pass your thoughts onto your friends. And please do not hesitate to reach out to us with further questions. We must keep in contact with our county and state politicians about this issue and how it will affect our great town.
 
     Also, view the various "plans" for the PATCO train. It really makes sense to follow the Rt 55 plan as that road was built to support a train accompaniment. And you will also see, the next meeting is in May. We hope to plan a "group" trip to this meeting. More information soon to come.
 
 
 

 Sincerely,

Friends of Wenonah








Fourth View of Wenonah NJ Train Station

                                                                      

Almost ten years ago in the fall of 1996 New Jersey Transit performed a “Major Investment Study” (MIS) in our region. Its stated purpose was to determine the feasibility and desirability of constructing light-rail mass-transit facilities from Trenton to Glassboro through Camden. The intent was to use the old existing rail bed built in the 1800’s. The estimated price tag for the system was $1.4 billion.

However even prior to the MIS study the idea of reintroducing rail passenger service to the tri-county area was not new, having been proposed many times by the Delaware River Port Authority starting as far back as 1936. (see attachment A)

The 1975 DRPA study entitled “Mass Transportation Development Program of the Delaware River Port Authority” was extremely comprehensive consisting of six documents covering the topics Transportation and Regional Planning, Engineering Investigations, Design Guidelines, Transportation System Design and Guidelines, Economic Evaluation of Transportation Improvements, and Recommended Transportation Development and Financial Plan for Implementation.

The 1975 study was very competently done being financed in part by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA). It was completed and released in December, 1975 and performed by Gannett Fleming Corddry and Carpenter, Inc. and Bellante, Clauss, Miller and Nolan, Inc., a Joint Venture of world-class engineering firms with excellent credentials.

The study examined every foot of the existing old rail facilities and concluded with the recommendation that a high-speed rail line in the median of Route 55 be utilized instead of using the old tracks.

The reason given for this recommendation was that “Although a Glassboro Line alignment following the PRSL Millville Branch has been studied, this alignment has been proven inferior on the basis of capital costs and disruption to the local community.”

Furthermore The DRPA MIS study was quite clear that in exchange for the hundreds of millions of federal dollars the new facilities would cost, it would most certainly be required to comply with federal transportation regulations of the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA) caling for complete coordination between rail transit and bus service within a region as a requisite for funding assistance.

UMTA required that all types of transportation be considered including heavy-rail rapid transit service, light rail transit systems, standard type bus service, as well as transportation service by demand activated bus systems, personal rapid transit systems and other alternative transport concepts even mentioning taxi services. Most of the more recent studies have been exceedingly weak concerning the use of alternative facilities.

And now the planning process has returned back to where it started with yet another study by the Delaware River Port Authority. Only this time there are significant differences. For example this is the first time that alternatives using the rights of ways of major highway Routes 42 and 55 are included in the study. Also the cost estimates have been made much more realistic with cost predictions of $77 to $96 million per mile for use of the existing rail route. Why are projected construction costs for the existing rail right of way so high? Because to counter previous criticisms about interfering with auto traffic at grade crossings the tracks wil be sunk into deep pits, or possibly even elevated, to provide unobstructed roadway crossings. Without question this form of construction and operation will have a devastating impact on the region, especially the residential areas of the communities it travels through. This aspect of the current DRPA plan is not being trumpeted but once local officials and residents become aware of it there will be a great outcry against the proposal.

Unfortunately this new study also appears to be repeating the mistakes of past studies by failing to recognize and address the need for cross-county corridor roads and other forms of mass transit to get the majority of people in Gloucester County to where they want to go, which for many is neither Camden nor Philadelphia.

Statistics developed during the 1996 MIS study revealed the following;

1.         Employment growth predictions, Gloucester County 31.5% as opposed to Philadelphia at 6.6% and Camden 5.4%. (Pg. 1-8) indicating the need to improve transportation means within the Tri-County Region, not toward Camden and Philadelphia.

2.         In 1990 12% of Gloucester County residents worked in Philadelphia and this was expected to increase by 10% by the year 2010. (Pg. 1-11) However the question that needs asking is “how close are these jobs to a high-speed line station?” University City in Philadelphia for example is substantially beyond reasonable walking distance.

3.         Auto trips into the region are expected to increase by 44% in next 30-years as employment sites on the “periphery” continue to attract workers living outside the region. (Pg. 1-12) Not mentioned was that these jobs will not be in Camden City or Philadelphia but in Camden County, Gloucester County and Burlington County.

4.         Automobile ownership in Gloucester County was expected to increase by 51% by the year 2010 “unless means are provided for reduction of auto trips, including their diversion to transit.” (Pg. 1-13) Unfortunately the DRPA is now apparently disregarding what its previous 1975 study recommendations, which were alternative traffic improvement methods such as new roads, demand activated bus systems, etc.

The recurrent theme I took away from the 1996 MIS study public meetings was that a great many of the people who expressed themselves felt that any new public transportation should be located closer to the more heavily populated communities such as Washington and Monroe Townships, and the northwestern part of Deptford Township where the auto traffic is the heaviest and currently causing the most severe problems.

Placing light rail in the centerlines of Route 42 and/or Route 55 are not perfect answers, however they would provide the common sense component of placing some form of public transportation facilities where the bulk of the population is located.

However building passenger rail in the medians of the north-south highways should not be considered the final solution to the overall transportation needs in the region.

As mentioned earlier and as demographic statistics bear out, the bulk of the people in our region do not travel to just the Philadelphia and Camden downtowns, they work and shop and play in areas east and west of these highways. In places like the Cherry Hill, Moorestown, Echelon and Deptford Malls. They live in and travel to the residential areas that have sprung up in the suburbs, and to parks and playgrounds that are scattered throughout Gloucester County. These destinations cannot be reached by any existing or proposed rail facilities. You can only get to there by private automobile or public bus.

It seems as though neither the money nor the political fortitude has been available in the past to tackle some of these difficult projects. At least they never seem to be mentioned as possible solutions. But now when project cost estimates in the range of $1.4 billion to $1.8 billion are being bandied about, shouldn’t we be thinking about the overall transportation needs of the region, and not just those of commuters to Camden and Philadelphia?

In closing I point out there have been at least four of these studies that I have been personally involved in starting in 1976. For anyone interested in the transportation problems in our region and concerned about the outcome of the studies I assure you it takes a lot of time to follow the study progress, attend public meetings, write letters and keep local officials up to date on what is happening. During those thirty years of my involvement auto traffic in the region has reached a crisis stage and public transit has failed to keep pace with the needs. I suggest all public officials, whether federal state or local, take heed that this study may be the last before we either start rationing time on the highways, or are forced to resort to bicycles as a means of getting around.

I urge the Delaware River Port Authority and our regional governmental representatives to concentrate on rail lines only in the two major highway rights-of-ways, Routes 42 and 55, and to give serious thought to improvements and additions to the east west roads throughout the region, and to other forms of public transportation as well.

Let us make this the last study before taking action. The time to act is now.

Prepared and submitted by;

Jack C. Sheppard, Sr.










Say a prayer for our troops

Make sure to get your Wenonah Lake Membership Badges!! Call the Borough office for details.
Web Hosting Companies